Showing 3 posts
Benjamin_Duranske
Benjamin_Duranske
Great Post
Apr 25 2007, 5:24 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 25 2007, 5:24 PM EDT
This nicely breaks down the impact of the change on local government, and -- I think correctly -- hints at the tools that a group like this might be able to package as a "government" franchise and sell, give away, or whatever. The change in the nature of abuse reporting is significant, and I'm surprised how many people are overlooking it. As is traditional, I take a less academic view of the change <a href="http://virtuallyblind.com/2007/04/25/linden-lab-takes-big-step-toward-private-legal-systems-and-governments-in-second-life/">over at Virtually Blind</a>, but if you're reading this you may want to read the post there as well, if for no other reason than to see what I expect will ultimately reflect the widespread response from attorney participants in SL. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
Benjamin_Duranske
Benjamin_Duranske
1. RE: Great Post
Apr 25 2007, 5:27 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 25 2007, 5:27 PM EDT
It appears tags are disabled. You can reach the post by cutting and pasting the following into your browser address bar (tinyURL resolves to Virtually Blind article):

http://tinyurl.com/3bhj3n


 Do you find this valuable?    
ashcroftburnham
ashcroftburnham
2. RE: Great Post
Apr 25 2007, 5:54 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 25 2007, 5:54 PM EDT
Thank you, Ben: I have noticed the response on your 'blog: that was partly what prompted me to write this in the first place. It is indeed interesting to see the different responses. The main point about the discussion on parallelism is to demonstrate that proper local government tools for all SecondLife/the grid is not in the least incompatible with Linden Lab's vision for the mainland/private estates split that underlies this new system. Do you find this valuable?